Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advantages of optical compared with electromagnetic tracking.
Glossop, Neil D.
Affiliation
  • Glossop ND; Traxtal Technologies Inc., 49 Spadina Avenue, No. 310, Toronto, ON M5V 2J1, Canada. neil@traxtal.com
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 91 Suppl 1: 23-8, 2009 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19182018
Tracking systems are critical to all types of computer-assisted image-guided intervention. Many technologies exist; however, only optical and electromagnetic systems are widely used commercially. In orthopaedic applications, optical systems dominate because of the large working volume and accuracy, but these systems suffer from deficiencies due to line of sight. Electromagnetic trackers can be made much smaller but are less accurate and are affected by metal, although current-generation systems are less affected by metal artifacts than were the earlier ones, which were more widely reported in the literature.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedic Procedures / Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Electromagnetic Phenomena / Optics and Photonics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Year: 2009 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedic Procedures / Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Electromagnetic Phenomena / Optics and Photonics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Year: 2009 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Country of publication: United States