Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography as an alternative to coronary angiography in the preoperative assessment of coronary artery disease before aortic valve surgery: a management outcome study.
Cornily, Jean-Christophe; Gilard, Martine; Bezon, Eric; Jan, Virginie; Pennec, Pierre-Yves; Etienne, Yves; Vinsonneau, Ulric; Le Gal, Grégoire; Mansourati, Jacques; Blanc, Jean-Jacques; Boschat, Jacques.
Affiliation
  • Cornily JC; Department of Cardiology, La Cavale-Blanche Hospital, Brest University Hospital, Brest cedex, France. jean-christophe.cornily@chu-brest.fr
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 103(3): 170-5, 2010 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20417448
BACKGROUND: Conventional coronary angiography (CA) is still recommended before valvular surgery. Preliminary studies suggest that multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) can be used to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD). AIM: To assess prospectively the safety of ruling out CAD before surgery solely on the basis of normal MSCT-CA in patients with severe aortic valve disease. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients scheduled for aortic valve surgery. We first estimated the calcium score (Agatston score equivalent [ASE]). Patients underwent injected MSCT if the ASE was<1000. CA was cancelled when MSCT-CA quality was sufficient and showed no significant CAD. Our primary endpoint was the occurrence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients who underwent surgery with no prior CA. RESULTS: Between 1st July 2005 and 30th June 2008, we included 199 patients with severe aortic valve disease: 118 men (59%); mean age 69+/-12 years; 63 patients (32%) underwent CA directly because the ASE was > or =1000. Of 136 patients who underwent MSCT-CA, 106 (78%) had a normal MSCT-CA and underwent aortic valve surgery without prior CA; CA was performed in 30 patients because of abnormal (n=18) or bad quality (n=12) MSCT-CA. One patient of the 106 (0.94%, 95% confidence interval 0.17-5.15) had a perioperative myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: When the ASE is <1000, MSCT is safe and may be recommended instead of CA as a first-line means of ruling out CAD in patients with severe aortic valve disease.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Valve Insufficiency / Aortic Valve Stenosis / Coronary Artery Disease / Coronary Angiography Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arch Cardiovasc Dis Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2010 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Valve Insufficiency / Aortic Valve Stenosis / Coronary Artery Disease / Coronary Angiography Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arch Cardiovasc Dis Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2010 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France Country of publication: Netherlands