A pilot survey of trial court judges' opinions on pro se competence after Indiana v. Edwards. | J Am Acad Psychiatry Law;38(4): 536-9, 2010. | MEDLINE

Main content 1 Search 2 Footer 3

+A A -A High contrast

VHL Regional Portal

Information and Knowledge for Health

Subject descriptor lookup Advanced Search EVID@Easy

A pilot survey of trial court judges' opinions on pro se competence after Indiana v. Edwards.

Knoll, James L; Leonard, Cecilia; Kaufman, Andrew R; Way, Bruce B.

Affiliation

Knoll JL; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 38(4): 536-9, 2010.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21156914

Subject(s)

Attitude; Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence; Data Collection; Forensic Psychiatry; Indiana; Mental Competency/psychology; New York; Supreme Court Decisions; United States

Search on Google

Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude / Mental Competency Type of study: Prognostic_studies Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Journal subject: JURISPRUDENCIA / PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2010 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Search on Google

Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude / Mental Competency Type of study: Prognostic_studies Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Journal subject: JURISPRUDENCIA / PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2010 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States