Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of tailored diabetes registry report cards on measures of disease control: a nested randomized trial.
Fischer, Henry H; Eisert, Sheri L; Durfee, M Josh; Moore, Susan L; Steele, Andrew W; McCullen, Kevin; Anderson, Katherine; Penny, Lara; Mackenzie, Thomas D.
Affiliation
  • Fischer HH; Community Health Services, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, 80204, USA. henry.fischer@dhha.org
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 11: 12, 2011 Feb 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21329495
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Most studies of diabetes self-management that show improved clinical outcome performance involve multiple, time-intensive educational sessions in a group format. Most provider performance feedback interventions do not improve intermediate outcomes, yet lack targeted, patient-level feedback.

METHODS:

5,457 low-income adults with diabetes at eight federally-qualified community health centers participated in this nested randomized trial. Half of the patients received report card mailings quarterly; patients at 4 of 8 clinics received report cards at every clinic visit; and providers at 4 of 8 clinics received quarterly performance feedback with targeted patient-level data. Expert-recommended glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure outcomes were assessed. Assessment of report card utility and patient and provider satisfaction was conducted through mailed patient surveys and mid- and post-intervention provider interviews.

RESULTS:

Many providers and the majority of patients perceived the patient report card as being an effective tool. However, patient report card mailings did not improve process outcomes, nor did point-of-care distribution improve intermediate outcomes. Clinics with patient-level provider performance feedback achieved a greater absolute increase in the percentage of patients at target for glycemic control compared to control clinics (6.4% vs 3.8% respectively, Generalized estimating equations Standard Error 0.014, p < 0.001, CI -0.131 - -0.077). Provider reaction to performance feedback was mixed, with some citing frustration with the lack of both time and ancillary resources.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patient performance report cards were generally well received by patients and providers, but were not associated with improved outcomes. Targeted, patient-level feedback to providers improved glycemic performance. Provider frustration highlights the need to supplement provider outreach efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00827710.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Registries / Diabetes Mellitus Type of study: Clinical_trials Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Registries / Diabetes Mellitus Type of study: Clinical_trials Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States