Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The DA VINCI Study: phase 2 primary results of VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with diabetic macular edema.
Do, Diana V; Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula; Gonzalez, Victor H; Gordon, Carmelina M; Tolentino, Michael; Berliner, Alyson J; Vitti, Robert; Rückert, Rene; Sandbrink, Rupert; Stein, David; Yang, Ke; Beckmann, Karola; Heier, Jeff S.
Affiliation
  • Do DV; Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ddo@jhmi.edu
Ophthalmology ; 118(9): 1819-26, 2011 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21546089
PURPOSE: To determine whether different doses and dosing regimens of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye are superior to focal/grid photocoagulation in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, phase 2 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 221 diabetic patients with clinically significant macular edema involving the central macula. METHODS: Patients were assigned to 1 of 5 treatment regimens: 0.5 mg VEGF Trap-Eye every 4 weeks; 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye every 4 weeks; 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye for 3 initial monthly doses and then every 8 weeks; 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye for 3 initial monthly doses and then on an as-needed (PRN) basis; or macular laser photocoagulation. Assessments were completed at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean change in visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patients in the 4 VEGF Trap-Eye groups experienced mean visual acuity benefits ranging from +8.5 to +11.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters versus only +2.5 letters in the laser group (P ≤ 0.0085 for each VEGF Trap-Eye group vs. laser). Gains from baseline of 0+, 10+, and 15+ letters were seen in up to 93%, 64%, and 34% of VEGF Trap-Eye groups versus up to 68%, 32%, and 21% in the laser group, respectively. Mean reductions in CRT in the 4 VEGF Trap-Eye groups ranged from -127.3 to -194.5 µm compared with only -67.9 µm in the laser group (P = 0.0066 for each VEGF Trap-Eye group vs. laser). VEGF Trap-Eye was generally well tolerated. Ocular adverse events in patients treated with VEGF Trap-Eye were generally consistent with those seen with other intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal VEGF Trap-Eye produced a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in visual acuity when compared with macular laser photocoagulation in patients with DME.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Recombinant Fusion Proteins / Macular Edema / Laser Coagulation / Diabetic Retinopathy Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ophthalmology Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Recombinant Fusion Proteins / Macular Edema / Laser Coagulation / Diabetic Retinopathy Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ophthalmology Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States