Comparison of fluoroscopy-guided Pull-type percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Pull-type-PRG) with conventional percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Push-type-PRG): clinical results in 253 patients.

Yang, Yang; Schneider, J; Düber, C; Pitton, M B

Yang, Yang; Schneider, J; Düber, C; Pitton, M B.

Affiliation

Yang Y; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany. yang@radiologie.klinik.uni-mainz.de

Eur Radiol ; 21(11): 2354-61, 2011 Nov.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21739349

Subject(s)

Fluoroscopy/methods; Gastrostomy/methods; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diagnostic Imaging/methods; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/surgery; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nervous System Diseases/surgery; Radiology/methods; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fluoroscopy / Gastrostomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google