Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing left ventricular systolic function in shock: evaluation of echocardiographic parameters in intensive care.
Bergenzaun, Lill; Gudmundsson, Petri; Öhlin, Hans; Düring, Joachim; Ersson, Anders; Ihrman, Lilian; Willenheimer, Ronnie; Chew, Michelle S.
Affiliation
  • Bergenzaun L; Department of Anaesthesiology, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Entrance 42, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Södra Förstadsgatan 101, S-20502 Malmö, Sweden. lill.bergenzaun@skane.se
Crit Care ; 15(4): R200, 2011 Aug 16.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21846331
INTRODUCTION: Assessing left ventricular (LV) systolic function in a rapid and reliable way can be challenging in the critically ill patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of, as well as the association between, commonly used LV systolic parameters, by using serial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHODS: Fifty patients with shock and mechanical ventilation were included. TTE examinations were performed daily for a total of 7 days. Methods used to assess LV systolic function were visually estimated, "eyeball" ejection fraction (EBEF), the Simpson single-plane method, mean atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPDm), septal tissue velocity imaging (TDIs), and velocity time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract (VTI). RESULTS: EBEF, AVPDm, TDIs, VTI, and the Simpson were obtained in 100%, 100%, 99%, 95% and 93%, respectively, of all possible examinations. The correlations between the Simpson and EBEF showed r values for all 7 days ranging from 0.79 to 0.95 (P < 0.01). the Simpson correlations with the other LV parameters showed substantial variation over time, with the poorest results seen for TDIs and AVPDm. The repeatability was best for VTI (interobserver coefficient of variation (CV) 4.8%, and intraobserver CV, 3.1%), and AVPDm (5.3% and 4.4%, respectively), and worst for the Simpson method (8.2% and 10.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EBEF and AVPDm provided the best, and Simpson, the worst feasibility when assessing LV systolic function in a population of mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically unstable patients. Additionally, the Simpson showed the poorest repeatability. We suggest that EBEF can be used instead of single-plane Simpson when assessing LV ejection fraction in this category of patients. TDIs and AVPDm, as markers of longitudinal function of the LV, are not interchangeable with LV ejection fraction.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shock, Septic / Blood Pressure / Echocardiography / Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Crit Care Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shock, Septic / Blood Pressure / Echocardiography / Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Crit Care Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden Country of publication: United kingdom