Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment.
Custers, Inge M; van Rumste, Minouche M E; van der Steeg, Jan Willem; van Wely, Madelon; Hompes, Peter G A; Bossuyt, Patrick; Broekmans, Frank J; Renckens, Cees N M; Eijkemans, Marinus J C; van Dessel, Thierry J H M; van der Veen, Fulco; Mol, Ben W J; Steures, Pieternel.
Affiliation
  • Custers IM; Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.m.custers@amc.uva.nl
Hum Reprod ; 27(2): 444-50, 2012 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22114108
BACKGROUND: We recently reported that treatment with intrauterine insemination and controlled ovarian stimulation (IUI-COS) did not increase ongoing pregnancy rates compared with expectant management (EM) in couples with unexplained subfertility and intermediate prognosis of natural conception. Long-term cost-effectiveness of a policy of initial EM is unknown. We investigated whether the recommendation not to treat during the first 6 months is valid, regarding the long-term effectiveness and cumulative costs. METHODS: Couples with unexplained subfertility and intermediate prognosis of natural conception (n=253, at 26 public clinics, the Netherlands) were randomly allocated to 6 months EM or immediate start with IUI-COS. The couples were then treated according to local protocol, usually IUI-COS followed by IVF. We followed couples until 3 years after randomization and registered pregnancies and resources used. Primary outcome was time to ongoing pregnancy. Secondary outcome was treatment costs. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Economic evaluation was performed from the perspective of the health care institution. RESULTS: Time to ongoing pregnancy did not differ between groups (log-rank test P=0.98). Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates were 72-73% for EM and IUI-COS groups, respectively [relative risk 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.1)]. Estimated mean costs per couple were € 3424 (95% CI € 880-€ 5968) in the EM group and € 6040 (95% CI € 4055-€ 8125) in the IUI-COS group resulting in an estimated saving of € 2616 per couple (95% CI € 385-€ 4847) in favour of EM. CONCLUSIONS: In couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis of natural conception, initial EM for 6 months results in a considerable cost-saving with no delay in achieving pregnancy or jeopardizing the chance of pregnancy. Further comparisons between aggressive and milder forms of ovarian stimulation should be performed.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovulation Induction / Fertilization / Infertility / Insemination, Artificial, Homologous Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Hum Reprod Journal subject: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovulation Induction / Fertilization / Infertility / Insemination, Artificial, Homologous Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Hum Reprod Journal subject: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United kingdom