Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized phase II study of dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Ramalingam, Suresh S; Blackhall, Fiona; Krzakowski, Maciej; Barrios, Carlos H; Park, Keunchil; Bover, Isabel; Seog Heo, Dae; Rosell, Rafael; Talbot, Denis C; Frank, Richard; Letrent, Stephen P; Ruiz-Garcia, Ana; Taylor, Ian; Liang, Jane Q; Campbell, Alicyn K; O'Connell, Joseph; Boyer, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Ramalingam SS; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Suite C-3090, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. suresh.ramalingam@emory.edu
J Clin Oncol ; 30(27): 3337-44, 2012 Sep 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22753918
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This randomized, open-label trial compared dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR)/HER1, HER2, and HER4, with erlotinib, a reversible EGFR inhibitor, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients with NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, no prior HER-directed therapy, and one/two prior chemotherapy regimens received dacomitinib 45 mg or erlotinib 150 mg once daily.

RESULTS:

One hundred eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned. Treatment arms were balanced for most clinical and molecular characteristics. Median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point) was 2.86 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 1.91 months for patients treated with erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.91; two-sided P = .012); in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, median PFS was 3.71 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 1.91 months for patients treated with erlotinib (HR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; two-sided P = .006); and in patients with KRAS wild-type/EGFR wild-type tumors, median PFS was 2.21 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 1.84 months for patients treated with erlotinib (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.99; two-sided P = .043). Median overall survival was 9.53 months for patients treated with dacomitinib and 7.44 months for patients treated with erlotinib (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.13; two-sided P = .205). Adverse event-related discontinuations were uncommon in both arms. Common treatment-related adverse events were dermatologic and gastrointestinal, predominantly grade 1 to 2, and more frequent with dacomitinib.

CONCLUSION:

Dacomitinib demonstrated significantly improved PFS versus erlotinib, with acceptable toxicity. PFS benefit was observed in most clinical and molecular subsets, notably KRAS wild-type/EGFR any status, KRAS wild-type/EGFR wild-type, and EGFR mutants.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quinazolines / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Protein Kinase Inhibitors / Quinazolinones / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Clin Oncol Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quinazolines / Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Protein Kinase Inhibitors / Quinazolinones / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Clin Oncol Year: 2012 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States