Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study.
Eekman, D A; van Helden, S H; Huisman, A M; Verhaar, H J J; Bultink, I E M; Geusens, P P; Lips, P; Lems, W F.
Affiliation
  • Eekman DA; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, d.eekman@vumc.nl.
Osteoporos Int ; 25(2): 701-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24030287
UNLABELLED: The response rate to the invitation to the fracture liaison service and reasons for non-response were evaluated in 2,207 fragility fracture patients. Fifty-one percent responded; non-responders were most often not interested (38 %) or were hip fracture patients. After 1 year of treatment, 88 % was still persistent and 2 % had a new fracture. INTRODUCTION: To increase the percentage of elderly fracture patients undergoing a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement, and to investigate why some patients did not respond to invitation to our fracture liaison service (FLS). METHODS: In four Dutch hospitals, fracture patients ≥ 50 years were invited through a written or personal invitation at the surgical outpatient department, for a DXA measurement and visit to our FLS. Patients who did not respond were contacted by telephone. In patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, treatment was started. Patients were contacted every 3 months during 1 year to assess drug persistence and the occurrence of subsequent fractures. RESULTS: Of the 2,207 patients who were invited, 50.6 % responded. Most frequent reasons for not responding included: not interested (38 %), already screened/under treatment for osteoporosis (15.7 %), physically unable to attend the clinic (11.5 %), and death (5.2 %). Hip fracture patients responded less frequently (29 %) while patients with a wrist (60 %) or ankle fracture (65.2 %) were more likely to visit the clinic. In 337 responding patients, osteoporosis was diagnosed and treatment was initiated. After 12 months of follow-up, 88 % of the patients were still persistent with anti-osteoporosis therapy and only 2 % suffered a subsequent clinical fracture. CONCLUSION: In elderly fracture patients, the use of a FLS leads to an increased response rate, a high persistence to drug treatment, and a low rate of subsequent clinical fractures. Additional programs for hip fracture patients are required, as these patients have a low response rate.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Preventive Health Services / Bone Density Conservation Agents / Osteoporotic Fractures Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Osteoporos Int Journal subject: METABOLISMO / ORTOPEDIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Preventive Health Services / Bone Density Conservation Agents / Osteoporotic Fractures Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Osteoporos Int Journal subject: METABOLISMO / ORTOPEDIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom