Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oncolytic measles and vesicular stomatitis virotherapy for endometrial cancer.
Liu, Yu-Ping; Steele, Michael B; Suksanpaisan, Lukkana; Federspiel, Mark J; Russell, Stephen J; Peng, Kah Whye; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N.
Affiliation
  • Liu YP; Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Steele MB; Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Suksanpaisan L; Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Federspiel MJ; Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Russell SJ; Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Peng KW; Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Division of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Bakkum-Gamez JN; Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: bakkum.jamie@mayo.edu.
Gynecol Oncol ; 132(1): 194-202, 2014 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24246772
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Current adjuvant therapy for advanced-stage, recurrent, and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) has not reduced mortality from this malignancy, and novel systemic therapies are imperative. Oncolytic viral therapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of gynecologic cancers, and we investigated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of the Edmonston strain of measles virus (MV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) on EC.

METHODS:

Human EC cell lines (HEC-1-A, Ishikawa, KLE, RL95-2, AN3 CA, ARK-1, ARK-2, and SPEC-2) were infected with Edmonston strain MV expressing the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter, VSV expressing either human or murine IFN-ß, or recombinant VSV with a methionine deletion at residue 51 of the matrix protein and expressing the sodium iodide symporter. Xenografts of HEC-1-A and AN3 CA generated in athymic mice were treated with intratumoral MV or VSV or intravenous VSV.

RESULTS:

In vitro, all cell lines were susceptible to infection and cell killing by all 3 VSV strains except KLE. In addition, the majority of EC cell lines were defective in their ability to respond to type I IFN. Intratumoral VSV-treated tumors regressed more rapidly than MV-treated tumors, and intravenous VSV resulted in effective tumor control in 100% of mice. Survival was significantly longer for mice treated with any of the 3 VSV strains compared with saline.

CONCLUSION:

VSV is clearly more potent in EC oncolysis than MV. A phase 1 clinical trial of VSV in EC is warranted.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endometrial Neoplasms / Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus / Oncolytic Virotherapy / Measles virus Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Animals / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Gynecol Oncol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Endometrial Neoplasms / Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus / Oncolytic Virotherapy / Measles virus Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Animals / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Gynecol Oncol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States