Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjunctive aerosolized colistin for multi-drug resistant gram-negative pneumonia in the critically ill: a retrospective study.
Doshi, Neha M; Cook, Charles H; Mount, Kari L; Stawicki, Stanislaw P; Frazee, Erin N; Personett, Heather A; Schramm, Garrett E; Arnold, Heather M; Murphy, Claire V.
Affiliation
  • Doshi NM; Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. claire.murphy@osumc.edu.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 13(1): 45, 2013 Nov 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24274315
BACKGROUND: The incidence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) gram-negative (GN) organisms including Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp has increased in the last decade, prompting re-evaluation of colistin for the management of these infections. Aerosolized colistin as an adjunct to intravenous therapy is a current option for the management of MDR-GN pneumonia, although data supporting this practice is limited. This study evaluates the efficacy of adjunctive aerosolized colistin in combination with intravenous colistin in critically ill patients with MDR-GN pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective multi-center cohort analysis comparing critically ill patients with MDR-GN pneumonia who received intravenous colistin (IV) alone or in combination with adjunctive aerosolized colistin (IV/AER) with a primary endpoint of clinical cure at the end of colistin therapy. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic cure, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and hospital mortality. A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed for patients with high quality cultures used for diagnosis of MDR-GN pneumonia. Dichotomous data were compared using Fisher's exact test while the student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used for continuous variables. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients met criteria for evaluation with 51 patients receiving IV and 44 receiving IV/AER. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Twenty patients (39.2%) receiving IV and 24 (54.5%) receiving IV/AER achieved clinical cure (p = 0.135). There was no difference in microbiologic cure rates between the IV and IV/AER colistin groups (40.7vs. 44.4%, p = 0.805). The IV group demonstrated a trend towards higher pneumonia attributable mortality (70.4 vs. 40%, p = 0.055). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high quality respiratory cultures, there was a significantly lower clinical cure rate for those in the IV group as compared to the IV/AER group (31.3 vs. 57.1%, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of aerosolized colistin to IV colistin may improve clinical cure and mortality for patients with MDR-GN pneumonia. Larger, prospective trials are warranted to confirm the benefit of adjunctive aerosolized colistin in critically ill patients with MDR-GN pneumonia.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Year: 2013 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Year: 2013 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom