Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of 16SpathDB 2.0, an automated 16S rRNA gene sequence database, using 689 complete bacterial genomes.
Teng, Jade L L; Ho, Tom C C; Yeung, Ronald S Y; Wong, Annette Y P; Wang, Haiyin; Chen, Chen; Fung, Kitty S C; Lau, Susanna K P; Woo, Patrick C Y.
Affiliation
  • Teng JL; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Research Centre of Infection and Immunology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Ho TC; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Yeung RS; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Pathology, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wong AY; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wang H; National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Disease Control and Prevention/State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
  • Chen C; National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Disease Control and Prevention/State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
  • Fung KS; Department of Pathology, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lau SK; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Research Centre of Infection and Immunology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Hong Kong, China; Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong, H
  • Woo PC; Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Research Centre of Infection and Immunology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Hong Kong, China; Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong, H
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 78(2): 105-15, 2014 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24295571
ABSTRACT
Interpretation of 16S rRNA sequences is a difficult problem faced by clinical microbiologists and technicians. In this study, we evaluated the updated 16SpathDB 2.0 database, using 689 16S rRNA sequences from 689 complete genomes of medically important bacteria. Among these 689 16S rRNA sequences, none was wrongly identified, with 35.8% reported as a single bacterial species having >98% identity with the query sequence (category 1), 63.9% reported as more than 1 bacterial species having >98% identity with the query sequence (category 2), 0.3% reported to the genus level (category 3), and none reported as no match (category 4). For the 16S rRNA sequences of non-duplicated bacterial species reported as category 1 or 2, the percentage of bacterial species reported as category 1 was significantly higher for anaerobic Gram-positive/Gram-negative bacteria than aerobic/facultative anaerobic Gram-positive/Gram-negative bacteria. 16SpathDB 2.0 is a user-friendly and accurate database for 16S rRNA sequence interpretation in clinical laboratories.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: RNA, Bacterial / RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Genome, Bacterial / Databases, Nucleic Acid Language: En Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: RNA, Bacterial / RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Genome, Bacterial / Databases, Nucleic Acid Language: En Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China