Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Control of the vertebral artery from a posterior approach: a technical report.
Ye, Jason Y; Ayyash, Omar M; Eskander, Mark S; Kang, James D.
Affiliation
  • Ye JY; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 1010, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: jyy2111@gmail.com.
  • Ayyash OM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 1010, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
  • Eskander MS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 1010, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
  • Kang JD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, 3471 Fifth Ave, Suite 1010, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Spine J ; 14(6): e37-41, 2014 Jun 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24361348
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Vertebral artery (VA) injury is a rare but potentially devastating complication of cervical spinal fusion. The Magerl and Harms techniques are associated with a rate between 0% to 8% and 0% to 5%, respectively. Most of reported VA injuries are related to surgical exposure or screw placement, which in turn is likely due to variability in VA anatomy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this report was to present the case of a 77-year-old woman, with a history of right VA occlusion, who sustained an intraoperative left VA injury during posterior cervical spine fusion and the subsequent intraoperative and postoperative management strategies. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-patient case report. METHODS: The patient was placed prone and into Mayfield tongs. A midline incision was made, and dissection was carried down to the lamina and facet joints from occiput to T2. During dissection, she sustained a left-sided VA injury, which was subsequently controlled. RESULTS: The patient was doing well at her 1-year postoperative visit without any residual neurologic deficits. Her severe neck pain had resolved. CONCLUSION: A detailed understanding of VA anatomy of each individual patient is paramount. There are four types of anomalies: intraforaminal; extraforaminal; arterial; and anomalies of the surrounding bony and soft-tissue architecture. In the event of a posterior intraoperative VA injury, we outlined an algorithm to deal with this complication: control bleeding temporarily to gain visualization of the arterial injury; remove lateral masses and tissue to adequately visualize the arterial injury; once visualized, control the bleeding and see if there are any neuromonitoring changes as a result of the VA occlusion; and proceed with definitive control of the artery by either repair or ligation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Vertebral Artery / Intraoperative Complications Type of study: Etiology_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Spine J Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Vertebral Artery / Intraoperative Complications Type of study: Etiology_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Spine J Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States