Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomaterials in search of a meniscus substitute.
Rongen, Jan J; van Tienen, Tony G; van Bochove, Bas; Grijpma, Dirk W; Buma, Pieter.
Affiliation
  • Rongen JJ; Orthopaedic Research Lab, Department of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Jan.rongen@radboudumc.nl.
  • van Tienen TG; Orthopaedic Research Lab, Department of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Centre, The Netherlands; Kliniek Viasana, Mill, The Netherlands.
  • van Bochove B; MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, and Department of Biomaterials Science and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
  • Grijpma DW; MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, and Department of Biomaterials Science and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands; University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, W.J. Kolff Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Netherlands.
  • Buma P; Orthopaedic Research Lab, Department of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Biomaterials ; 35(11): 3527-40, 2014 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24477194
ABSTRACT
The menisci fulfill key biomechanical functions in the tibiofemoral (knee) joint. Unfortunately meniscal injuries are quite common and most often treated by (partial) meniscectomy. However, some patients experience enduring symptoms, and, more importantly, it leads to an increased risk for symptomatic osteoarthritis. Over the past decades, researchers have put effort in developing a meniscal substitute able to prevent osteoarthritis and treat enduring clinical symptoms. Grossly, two categories of substitutes are observed First, a resorbable scaffold mimicking biomechanical function which slowly degrades while tissue regeneration and organization is promoted. Second, a non resorbable, permanent implant which mimics the biomechanical function of the native meniscus. Numerous biomaterials with different (material) properties have been used in order to provide such a substitute. Nevertheless, a clinically applicable cartilage protecting material is not yet emerged. In the current review we provide an overview, and discuss, these different materials and extract recommendations regarding material properties for future developmental research.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biocompatible Materials / Menisci, Tibial / Absorbable Implants Type of study: Guideline Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Biomaterials Year: 2014 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biocompatible Materials / Menisci, Tibial / Absorbable Implants Type of study: Guideline Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Biomaterials Year: 2014 Document type: Article