Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Twenty-year experience of transvenous lead extraction at a single centre.
Gomes, Sean; Cranney, Gregory; Bennett, Michael; Li, Annette; Giles, Robert.
Affiliation
  • Gomes S; Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia sgomes@med.usyd.edu.au.
  • Cranney G; Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia.
  • Bennett M; Department of Anaesthetics, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia.
  • Li A; University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia.
  • Giles R; Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney 2031, Australia.
Europace ; 16(9): 1350-5, 2014 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24554523
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Indications for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices continue to evolve, which has led to an increasing requirement for transvenous lead extraction. We explore the indications, complications, and success rates involved in the removal of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads in a high-volume centre, over 20 years. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction by a single operator at a single centre between 1993 and 2012. Patient characteristics, indications, and outcomes were analysed. A total of 1006 leads were removed from 510 patients. Seventy-two per cent of patients were males. The mean age was 64 years (range 14-96). Indications included systemic infection (25%), pocket infection (40%), lead failure (26%), chronic pain (3%), and other (6%). Ninety-six per cent of leads were completely removed. There was one procedure-related death, and the major complication rate was 0.3%. Infection was the only identified predictor of increased complication (χ² for difference between groups 20, P< 0.0001).

CONCLUSION:

Pacing and ICD leads can be safely extracted with mechanical techniques. The presence of device infection appears to be the major predictor of procedural complications.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Prosthesis Failure / Prosthesis-Related Infections / Defibrillators, Implantable / Device Removal / Electrodes, Implanted Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Europace Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Prosthesis Failure / Prosthesis-Related Infections / Defibrillators, Implantable / Device Removal / Electrodes, Implanted Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Europace Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia