Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A modelled comparison of prostate cancer control rates after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (3145 multicentre patients) combined with, or in contrast to, external-beam radiotherapy.
Roberts, Stephen A; Miralbell, Raymond; Zubizarreta, Eduardo H; Fowler, Jack F; Hendry, Jolyon H.
Affiliation
  • Roberts SA; Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: steve.roberts@manchester.ac.uk.
  • Miralbell R; University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Institut Oncològic Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Zubizarreta EH; International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
  • Fowler JF; 150 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7DF, United Kingdom.
  • Hendry JH; Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Radiother Oncol ; 111(1): 114-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24560762
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

To analyse biochemical relapse-free-survival results for prostate cancer patients receiving combined external beam and high-dose-rate brachytherapy, in comparison with expected results using projections based on dose/fractionation/response parameter values deduced from a previous external-beam-alone 5969-patient multicentre dataset. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Results on a total of 3145 prostate cancer patients receiving brachytherapy (BT) as part or all of their treatment were collected from 10 institutions, and subjected to linear-quadratic (LQ) modelling of dose response and fractionation parameters.

RESULTS:

Treatments with BT components of less than 25Gy, 3-4 BT fractions, doses per BT fraction up to 6Gy, and treatment times of 3-7weeks, all gave outcomes expected from LQ projections of the external-beam-alone data (α/ß=1.42Gy). However, BT doses higher than 30Gy, 1-2 fractions, 9 fractions (BT alone), doses per fraction of 9-15Gy, and treatment in only 1week (one example), gave local control levels lower than the expected levels by up to ∼35%.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are various potential causes of the lower-than-projected control levels for some schedules of brachytherapy it seems plausible that cold spots in the brachytherapy dose distribution may be contributory, and the applicability of the LQ model at high doses per fraction remains somewhat uncertain. The results of further trials may help elucidate the true benefit of hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Brachytherapy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Radiother Oncol Year: 2014 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Brachytherapy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Radiother Oncol Year: 2014 Document type: Article