Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Feedback on service provision in cancer patients using the Ward Satisfaction Questionnaire (WSQ)--testing a new tool]. / Einschätzung von Visite und Stationsalltag bei Krebspatienten mit dem Stationsfragebogen (SFB)--Erprobung eines neuen Instrumentes.
Singer, S; Hornemann, B; Hertzschuch, D; Elchlep, F; Hentschel, L; Ehninger, G; Schuler, M K.
Affiliation
  • Singer S; Abteilung Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz.
  • Hornemann B; Psychoonkologischer Dienst, Universitätskrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden.
  • Hertzschuch D; Zentralbereich Qualitäts- und Medizinisches Risikomanagement, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden.
  • Elchlep F; Zentralbereich Qualitäts- und Medizinisches Risikomanagement, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden.
  • Hentschel L; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I und Universitätskrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden.
  • Ehninger G; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I und Universitätskrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden.
  • Schuler MK; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I und Universitätskrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 139(27): 1409-14, 2014 Jul.
Article in De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24870452
BACKGROUND: Collecting information on patients' experiences and opinions is prerequisite to improving the quality of services at a ward. The Ward Satisfaction Questionnaire (WSQ) was developed for this purpose. We investigated its psychometric characteristics and percentage of missing values. METHODS: Over a period of 4 months, all patients at an interdisciplinary and an oncology ward were asked to complete the WSQ. Concordant validity was assessed using the Patient Involvement in Care Scales (PICS). RESULTS: 68 of 99 administered questionnaires were completed (response rate 69 %). The median of missing values per item was 6 % (0 -28 %). Internal consistency of the WSQ scales ranged from 0.68 ("Accessibility of Doctors") to 0.94 ("Doctor Consultations"). Cronbach's Alpha of the total score was 0.94. Scaling errors were 0 % ("Ward Rounds", "Doctor Consulations", "Accessibility Nurses") to 17 % ("Accessibility Doctors"). Variances of WSQ scales were relatively low. Correlation patterns of WSQ and PICS support the validity of WSQ. CONCLUSIONS: The WSQ facilitates systematic feedback on inpatient services. Psychometric characteristics are good and validation in a larger patient sample is warranted.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Surveys and Questionnaires / Patient Satisfaction / Hospitalization / Neoplasms Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: De Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Surveys and Questionnaires / Patient Satisfaction / Hospitalization / Neoplasms Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: De Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany