Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of clinical outcomes and genomic characteristics of single focus and multifocal glioblastoma.
Paulsson, Anna K; Holmes, Jordan A; Peiffer, Ann M; Miller, Lance D; Liu, Wennuan; Xu, Jianfeng; Hinson, William H; Lesser, Glenn J; Laxton, Adrian W; Tatter, Stephen B; Debinski, Waldemar; Chan, Michael D.
Affiliation
  • Paulsson AK; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
J Neurooncol ; 119(2): 429-35, 2014 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24990827
ABSTRACT
We investigate the differences in molecular signature and clinical outcomes between multiple lesion glioblastoma (GBM) and single focus GBM in the modern treatment era. Between August 2000 and May 2010, 161 patients with GBM were treated with modern radiotherapy techniques. Of this group, 33 were considered to have multiple lesion GBM (25 multifocal and 8 multicentric). Patterns of failure, time to progression and overall survival were compared based on whether the tumor was considered a single focus or multiple lesion GBM. Genomic groupings and methylation status were also investigated as a possible predictor of multifocality in a cohort of 41 patients with available tissue for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (p < 0.3) between the multiple lesion tumors (8.2 months) and single focus GBM (11 months). Progression free survival was superior in the single focus tumors (7.1 months) as compared to multi-focal (5.6 months, p = 0.02). For patients with single focus, multifocal and multicentric GBM, 81, 76 and 88 % of treatment failures occurred in the 60 Gy volume (p < 0.5), while 54, 72, and 38 % of treatment failures occurred in the 46 Gy volume (p < 0.4). Out of field failures were rare in both single focus and multiple foci GBM (7 vs 3 %). Genomic groupings and methylation status were not found to predict for multifocality. Patterns of failure, survival and genomic signatures for multiple lesion GBM do not appreciably differ when compared to single focus tumors.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurooncol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurooncol Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...