Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In situ assessment of effects of the bromide- and fluoride-incorporating adhesive systems on biofilm and secondary caries.
Vasconcelos, Suyane Maria Luna Cruz de; Melo, Mary Anne Sampaio de; Wenceslau, Joao Paulo Marques Saraiva; Zanin, Iriana Carla Junqueira; Beltrao, Haroldo Cesar Pinheiro; Fernandes, Carlos Augusto Oliveira; Almeida, Paulo Cesar de; Rodrigues, Lidiany Karla Azevedo.
Affiliation
  • Vasconcelos SM; Student, Post-graduation Program in Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Ceara Brazil.
  • Melo MA; Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore MD, USA.
  • Wenceslau JP; Undergraduate Student , Faculty of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Ceara, Brazil.
  • Zanin IC; Associate Professor, The School of Dentistry of Sobral; Professor of the Post-graduation Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceara Ceara, Brazil.
  • Beltrao HC; Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Ceara Brazil.
  • Fernandes CA; Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceara, Ceara Brazil.
  • Almeida PC; Associate Professor, Department of Public Health, Ceara State University, Ceara Brazil.
  • Rodrigues LK; Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy Dentistry and Nursing; Professor of the Post-graduation Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceara, Ceara, Brazil.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 15(2): 142-8, 2014 Mar 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25095833
ABSTRACT

AIM:

This in situ study assessed the effects of adhesive systems containing or not fluoride and/or the antibacterial monomer 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) on the microbiological composition of dental biofilm and enamel demineralization. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

During two phases of 14 days, ten volunteers wore intraoral palatal appliances containing two slabs of human enamel according to a double-blind, crossover design. The slabs were randomly restored using a composite resin and one of the following adhesive systems All-Bond SE(TM) (self-etch, fluoride/MDPB free adhesive, AB) and Clearfl Protect Bond (self-etch containing fluoride and MDPB adhesive, CB). The biofilm formed on the slabs was analyzed with regard to total and mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts. Demineralization represented by integrated area of hardness × lesion depth Delta S ( ΔS) was determined on enamel by analysis of cross-sectional microhardness, at 20 and 70 µm from the restoration margin. Data were analyzed by ANOVA.

RESULTS:

No statistically significant difference was found either in enamel demineralization or in the microbiological composition of dental biofilm.

CONCLUSION:

All adhesive systems containing or not fluoride and/or MDPB tested were unable to inhibit secondary caries in the in situ model used in the present research.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pyridinium Compounds / Cariostatic Agents / Biofilms / Resin Cements / Dental Caries / Fluorides Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: J Contemp Dent Pract Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pyridinium Compounds / Cariostatic Agents / Biofilms / Resin Cements / Dental Caries / Fluorides Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: J Contemp Dent Pract Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article