Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Progress Report of the IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests.
Thienpont, Linda M; Van Uytfanghe, Katleen; Van Houcke, Sofie; Das, Barnali; Faix, James D; MacKenzie, Finlay; Quinn, Frank A; Rottmann, Michael; Van den Bruel, Annick.
Affiliation
  • Thienpont LM; Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Bruges, Belgium.
  • Van Uytfanghe K; Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Bruges, Belgium.
  • Van Houcke S; Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Bruges, Belgium.
  • Das B; Biochemistry and Immunology Laboratory, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, India.
  • Faix JD; Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif., USA.
  • MacKenzie F; Birmingham Quality/UK NEQAS, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Quinn FA; Medical and Scientific Affairs, Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill., USA.
  • Rottmann M; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.
  • Van den Bruel A; Department of Endocrinology, General Hospital Sint Jan, Bruges, Belgium.
Eur Thyroid J ; 3(2): 109-16, 2014 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25114874
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests aims at equivalence of laboratory test results for free thyroxine (FT4) and thyrotropin (TSH).

OBJECTIVES:

This report describes the phase III method comparison study with clinical samples representing a broad spectrum of thyroid disease. The objective was to expand the feasibility work and explore the impact of standardization/harmonization in the clinically relevant concentration range.

METHODS:

Two sets of serum samples (74 for FT4, 94 for TSH) were obtained in a clinical setting. Eight manufacturers participated in the study (with 13 FT4 and 14 TSH assays). Targets for FT4 were set by the international conventional reference measurement procedure of the IFCC; those for TSH were based on the all-procedure trimmed mean. The manufacturers recalibrated their assays against these targets.

RESULTS:

All FT4 assays were negatively biased in the mid- to high concentration range, with a maximum interassay discrepancy of approximately 30%. However, in the low range, the maximum deviation was approximately 90%. For TSH, interassay comparability was reasonable in the mid-concentration range, but worse in the pathophysiological ranges. Recalibration was able to eliminate the interassay differences, so that the remaining dispersion of the data was nearly entirely due to within-assay random error components. The impact of recalibration on the numerical results was particularly high for FT4.

CONCLUSIONS:

Standardization and harmonization of FT4 and TSH measurements is feasible from a technical point of view. Because of the impact on the numerical values, the implementation needs careful preparation with the stakeholders.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur Thyroid J Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur Thyroid J Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium