Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.
Sheppard, Evan D; Hyde, Zane; Florence, Mason N; McGwin, Gerald; Kirchner, John S; Ponce, Brent A.
Affiliation
  • Sheppard ED; Division of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Trussville, AL, USA.
  • Hyde Z; Division of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Trussville, AL, USA.
  • Florence MN; Division of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Trussville, AL, USA.
  • McGwin G; Division of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Trussville, AL, USA.
  • Kirchner JS; Division of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Trussville, AL, USA.
  • Ponce BA; Division of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Trussville, AL, USA bponce@uabmc.edu.
Foot Ankle Int ; 35(12): 1282-6, 2014 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25239196
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Previous studies have shown the need for improving the readability of many patient education materials to increase patient comprehension. This study's purpose was to determine the readability of foot and ankle patient education materials and to determine the extent readability can be improved. We hypothesized that the reading levels would be above the recommended guidelines and that decreasing the sentence length would also decrease the reading level of these patient educational materials.

METHODS:

Patient education materials from online public sources were collected. The readability of these articles was assessed by a readability software program. The detailed instructions provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were then used as a guideline for performing edits to help improve the readability of selected articles. The most quantitative guideline, lowering all sentences to less than 15 words, was chosen to show the effect of following the NIH recommendations.

RESULTS:

The reading levels of the sampled articles were above the sixth to seventh grade recommendations of the NIH. The MedlinePlus website, which is a part of the NIH website, had the lowest reading level (8.1). The articles edited had an average reduction of 1.41 grade levels, with the lowest reduction in the Medline articles of 0.65.

CONCLUSION:

Providing detailed instructions to the authors writing these patient education articles and implementing editing techniques based on previous recommendations could lead to an improvement in the readability of patient education materials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study provides authors of patient education materials with simple editing techniques that will allow for the improvement in the readability of online patient educational materials. The improvement in readability will provide patients with more comprehendible education materials that can strengthen patient awareness of medical problems and treatments.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Patient Education as Topic / Internet / Comprehension / Consumer Health Information Type of study: Guideline Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Foot Ankle Int Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Patient Education as Topic / Internet / Comprehension / Consumer Health Information Type of study: Guideline Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Foot Ankle Int Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States