Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards component-based validation of GATE: aspects of the coincidence processor.
Moraes, Eder R; Poon, Jonathan K; Balakrishnan, Karthikayan; Wang, Wenli; Badawi, Ramsey D.
Affiliation
  • Moraes ER; Departamento de Física - FFCLRP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, SP 14040-901, Brazil. Electronic address: eder@ffclrp.usp.br.
  • Poon JK; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  • Balakrishnan K; Toshiba Medical Research Institute USA Inc., 706 N. Deerpath Dr., Vernon Hills, IL 60061, USA.
  • Wang W; Toshiba Medical Research Institute USA Inc., 706 N. Deerpath Dr., Vernon Hills, IL 60061, USA.
  • Badawi RD; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California-Davis Medical Center, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Phys Med ; 31(1): 43-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25240897
GATE is public domain software widely used for Monte Carlo simulation in emission tomography. Validations of GATE have primarily been performed on a whole-system basis, leaving the possibility that errors in one sub-system may be offset by errors in others. We assess the accuracy of the GATE PET coincidence generation sub-system in isolation, focusing on the options most closely modeling the majority of commercially available scanners. Independent coincidence generators were coded by teams at Toshiba Medical Research Unit (TMRU) and UC Davis. A model similar to the Siemens mCT scanner was created in GATE. Annihilation photons interacting with the detectors were recorded. Coincidences were generated using GATE, TMRU and UC Davis code and results compared to "ground truth" obtained from the history of the photon interactions. GATE was tested twice, once with every qualified single event opening a time window and initiating a coincidence check (the "multiple window method"), and once where a time window is opened and a coincidence check initiated only by the first single event to occur after the end of the prior time window (the "single window method"). True, scattered and random coincidences were compared. Noise equivalent count rates were also computed and compared. The TMRU and UC Davis coincidence generators agree well with ground truth. With GATE, reasonable accuracy can be obtained if the single window method option is chosen and random coincidences are estimated without use of the delayed coincidence option. However in this GATE version, other parameter combinations can result in significant errors.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Software / Positron-Emission Tomography Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Phys Med Journal subject: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Country of publication: Italy

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Software / Positron-Emission Tomography Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Phys Med Journal subject: BIOFISICA / BIOLOGIA / MEDICINA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Country of publication: Italy