Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rehabilitation of individuals on long-term sick leave due to sustained stress-related symptoms: a comparative follow-up study.
Willert, Morten Vejs; Wieclaw, Joanna; Thulstrup, Ane Marie.
Affiliation
  • Willert MV; Danish Ramazzini Centre, Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Region Midt, Denmark morten.willert@aarhus.rm.dk.
  • Wieclaw J; ArbejdsmiljøCentret, previously at the Centre for Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Region Midt, Denmark.
  • Thulstrup AM; Danish Ramazzini Centre, Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Region Midt, Denmark.
Scand J Public Health ; 42(8): 719-27, 2014 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351769
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Nature-assisted therapy for mental health problems receives increased attention. However, quantitative evaluations are rare. This study evaluates the effects of an all-outdoors vocational rehabilitation program for individuals on long-term sick leave due to sustained stress-related symptoms.

METHODS:

In a comparative pre-post intervention design the intervention group contained 48 participants from Mariendal Gardens (MG), while 45 participants at Stress- & Jobmanagement (SJ) formed the comparison group. At MG all activities took place outdoors, while activities at SJ were mainly indoors. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-up. Outcomes included Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and measures of sleep, mindfulness, self-efficacy, daily functioning, and work ability. Data were analyzed using mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS:

At baseline the MG-group PSS-10 mean score was 25.15 points (SD=7.20), while the SJ-group mean score was 23.91 (SD=7.48). At 3-months the MG within-group score dropped 4.61 [2.71; 6.52] points (p<0.01), corresponding to at standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) of d=0.64 [0.38; 0.91], while the SJ within-group score dropped 4.16 [1.73; 6.59] points (p<0.01), corresponding to d=0.56 [0.23; 0.88]. The between-group mean difference was not significant (p=0.77). Similarly, results for sleep, mindfulness, self-efficacy, daily functioning, and work ability demonstrated significant within-group effects and minimal between-group differences.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both interventions demonstrated small to large pre-post effect sizes. Negligible differences were observed between the effects of the two interventions, indicating no added effect of the all-outdoors setting. Results should be interpreted with caution as unequal lost to follow-up rates threatens the comparability of changes in the two groups.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rehabilitation, Vocational / Stress, Psychological / Complementary Therapies / Sick Leave / Nature Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Scand J Public Health Journal subject: MEDICINA SOCIAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rehabilitation, Vocational / Stress, Psychological / Complementary Therapies / Sick Leave / Nature Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Scand J Public Health Journal subject: MEDICINA SOCIAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark