Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with a History of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Feasibility and Evaluation of Initial Outcomes.
Gellhaus, Paul T; Monn, M Francesca; Leese, Joshua; Flack, Chandra K; Lingeman, James E; Koch, Michael O; Boris, Ronald S.
Affiliation
  • Gellhaus PT; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Monn MF; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Leese J; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Flack CK; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Lingeman JE; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Koch MO; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Boris RS; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Endourol ; 29(7): 764-9, 2015 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25423412
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate outcomes of post-holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Using an institutional database, we identified 11 HoLEP patients who subsequently underwent RARP. These were matched 12 to RARP patients without a previous transurethral surgical procedure. Variables matched were age, pre-RARP prostate-specific antigen level, and biopsy Gleason score. Urinary continence and sexual function were evaluated by physician questioning, American Urological Association symptom score, and Sexual Health in Men (SHIM) scores. Descriptive statistics were used to compare cohorts.

RESULTS:

RARP pathologic outcomes were similar between cases and controls. Twenty-seven percent of previous HoLEP patients reached strict urinary continence (leak free, pad free) at last follow-up compared with 64% of matched controls (P=0.071). The average (range) SHIM score at last follow-up was 2.6 (1-5) for previous HoLEP patients compared with 13.9 (5-20) (P<0.001). The posterior bladder neck and apical dissections were significantly more challenging in the setting of previous HoLEP and necessitated a low threshold for wider resection to minimize positive surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS:

Post-HoLEP RARP is challenging but preliminarily appears safe and feasible when performed by an experienced robotic surgeon. Patients should be counseled regarding expectations of urinary continence and sexual function in this setting.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Hyperplasia / Laser Therapy / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Endourol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2015 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Hyperplasia / Laser Therapy / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Endourol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2015 Document type: Article