Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implications of the circumpolar genetic structure of polar bears for their conservation in a rapidly warming Arctic.
Peacock, Elizabeth; Sonsthagen, Sarah A; Obbard, Martyn E; Boltunov, Andrei; Regehr, Eric V; Ovsyanikov, Nikita; Aars, Jon; Atkinson, Stephen N; Sage, George K; Hope, Andrew G; Zeyl, Eve; Bachmann, Lutz; Ehrich, Dorothee; Scribner, Kim T; Amstrup, Steven C; Belikov, Stanislav; Born, Erik W; Derocher, Andrew E; Stirling, Ian; Taylor, Mitchell K; Wiig, Øystein; Paetkau, David; Talbot, Sandra L.
Affiliation
  • Peacock E; Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America; Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada.
  • Sonsthagen SA; Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
  • Obbard ME; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
  • Boltunov A; All-Russian Research Institute for Nature Protection, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Regehr EV; US Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
  • Ovsyanikov N; Wrangel Island State Nature Reserve, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Aars J; Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Atkinson SN; Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada.
  • Sage GK; Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
  • Hope AG; Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
  • Zeyl E; Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Bachmann L; Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Ehrich D; Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Scribner KT; Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
  • Amstrup SC; Polar Bears International, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.
  • Belikov S; All-Russian Research Institute for Nature Protection, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Born EW; Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Derocher AE; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Stirling I; Science & Technology Branch, Environment Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Taylor MK; Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wiig Ø; Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Paetkau D; Wildlife Genetics International, Nelson, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Talbot SL; Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 10(1): e112021, 2015.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25562525
ABSTRACT
We provide an expansive analysis of polar bear (Ursus maritimus) circumpolar genetic variation during the last two decades of decline in their sea-ice habitat. We sought to evaluate whether their genetic diversity and structure have changed over this period of habitat decline, how their current genetic patterns compare with past patterns, and how genetic demography changed with ancient fluctuations in climate. Characterizing their circumpolar genetic structure using microsatellite data, we defined four clusters that largely correspond to current ecological and oceanographic factors Eastern Polar Basin, Western Polar Basin, Canadian Archipelago and Southern Canada. We document evidence for recent (ca. last 1-3 generations) directional gene flow from Southern Canada and the Eastern Polar Basin towards the Canadian Archipelago, an area hypothesized to be a future refugium for polar bears as climate-induced habitat decline continues. Our data provide empirical evidence in support of this hypothesis. The direction of current gene flow differs from earlier patterns of gene flow in the Holocene. From analyses of mitochondrial DNA, the Canadian Archipelago cluster and the Barents Sea subpopulation within the Eastern Polar Basin cluster did not show signals of population expansion, suggesting these areas may have served also as past interglacial refugia. Mismatch analyses of mitochondrial DNA data from polar and the paraphyletic brown bear (U. arctos) uncovered offset signals in timing of population expansion between the two species, that are attributed to differential demographic responses to past climate cycling. Mitogenomic structure of polar bears was shallow and developed recently, in contrast to the multiple clades of brown bears. We found no genetic signatures of recent hybridization between the species in our large, circumpolar sample, suggesting that recently observed hybrids represent localized events. Documenting changes in subpopulation connectivity will allow polar nations to proactively adjust conservation actions to continuing decline in sea-ice habitat.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Variation / Ursidae / Climate Change / Conservation of Natural Resources / Genetic Structures Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genetic Variation / Ursidae / Climate Change / Conservation of Natural Resources / Genetic Structures Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
...