Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Identification in Polyploids: A Review, Example, and Recommendations.
Clevenger, Josh; Chavarro, Carolina; Pearl, Stephanie A; Ozias-Akins, Peggy; Jackson, Scott A.
Affiliation
  • Clevenger J; Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics & Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA.
  • Chavarro C; Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
  • Pearl SA; Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
  • Ozias-Akins P; Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics & Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USA. Electronic address: pozias@uga.edu.
  • Jackson SA; Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. Electronic address: sjackson@uga.edu.
Mol Plant ; 8(6): 831-46, 2015 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676455
ABSTRACT
Understanding the relationship between genotype and phenotype is a major biological question and being able to predict phenotypes based on molecular genotypes is integral to molecular breeding. Whole-genome duplications have shaped the history of all flowering plants and present challenges to elucidating the relationship between genotype and phenotype, especially in neopolyploid species. Although single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have become popular tools for genetic mapping, discovery and application of SNPs in polyploids has been difficult. Here, we summarize common experimental approaches to SNP calling, highlighting recent polyploid successes. To examine the impact of software choice on these analyses, we called SNPs among five peanut genotypes using different alignment programs (BWA-mem and Bowtie 2) and variant callers (SAMtools, GATK, and Freebayes). Alignments produced by Bowtie 2 and BWA-mem and analyzed in SAMtools shared 24.5% concordant SNPs, and SAMtools, GATK, and Freebayes shared 1.4% concordant SNPs. A subsequent analysis of simulated Brassica napus chromosome 1A and 1C genotypes demonstrated that, of the three software programs, SAMtools performed with the highest sensitivity and specificity on Bowtie 2 alignments. These results, however, are likely to vary among species, and we therefore propose a series of best practices for SNP calling in polyploids.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arachis / Plant Proteins / Polyploidy / Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Brassica napus Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Mol Plant Journal subject: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / BOTANICA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arachis / Plant Proteins / Polyploidy / Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Brassica napus Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Mol Plant Journal subject: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / BOTANICA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States