Direct comparison of conventional radiography and cone-beam CT in small bone and joint trauma.

De Smet, E; De Praeter, G; Verstraete, K L A; Wouters, K; De Beuckeleer, Luc; Vanhoenacker, F M H M

De Smet, E; De Praeter, G; Verstraete, K L A; Wouters, K; De Beuckeleer, Luc; Vanhoenacker, F M H M.

Affiliation

De Smet E; Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium, elinedesmet@hotmail.com.

Skeletal Radiol ; 44(8): 1111-7, 2015 Aug.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25761727

Subject(s)

Arthrography/methods; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods; Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging; Joints/injuries; Radiation Exposure/analysis; X-Ray Film; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Radiation Dosage; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Single-Blind Method; Young Adult

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: X-Ray Film / Arthrography / Radiation Exposure / Fractures, Bone / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Joints Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Skeletal Radiol Year: 2015 Document type: Article Country of publication: Germany

Fulltext

Add to My VHL

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google