Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
Maples, Jessica L; Carter, Nathan T; Few, Lauren R; Crego, Cristina; Gore, Whitney L; Samuel, Douglas B; Williamson, Rachel L; Lynam, Donald R; Widiger, Thomas A; Markon, Kristian E; Krueger, Robert F; Miller, Joshua D.
Affiliation
  • Maples JL; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
  • Carter NT; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
  • Few LR; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine.
  • Crego C; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
  • Gore WL; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
  • Samuel DB; Department of Psychology, Purdue University.
  • Williamson RL; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
  • Lynam DR; Department of Psychology, Purdue University.
  • Widiger TA; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
  • Markon KE; Department of Psychology, University of Iowa.
  • Krueger RF; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
  • Miller JD; Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
Psychol Assess ; 27(4): 1195-210, 2015 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25844534
ABSTRACT
The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) includes an alternative model of personality disorders (PDs) in Section III, consisting in part of a pathological personality trait model. To date, the 220-item Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012) is the only extant self-report instrument explicitly developed to measure this pathological trait model. The present study used item response theory-based analyses in a large sample (n = 1,417) to investigate whether a reduced set of 100 items could be identified from the PID-5 that could measure the 25 traits and 5 domains. This reduced set of PID-5 items was then tested in a community sample of adults currently receiving psychological treatment (n = 109). Across a wide range of criterion variables including NEO PI-R domains and facets, DSM-5 Section II PD scores, and externalizing and internalizing outcomes, the correlational profiles of the original and reduced versions of the PID-5 were nearly identical (rICC = .995). These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that an abbreviated set of PID-5 items can be used to reliably, validly, and efficiently assess these personality disorder traits. The ability to assess the DSM-5 Section III traits using only 100 items has important implications in that it suggests these traits could still be measured in settings in which assessment-related resources (e.g., time, compensation) are limited.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personality Disorders / Personality Inventory / Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Psychol Assess Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA Year: 2015 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personality Disorders / Personality Inventory / Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Psychol Assess Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA Year: 2015 Document type: Article