Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis classification of primary breast cancer.
Waugh, S A; Purdie, C A; Jordan, L B; Vinnicombe, S; Lerski, R A; Martin, P; Thompson, A M.
Affiliation
  • Waugh SA; Department of Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. shelley.waugh@nhs.net.
  • Purdie CA; Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Jordan LB; Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Vinnicombe S; Division of Imaging and Technology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Lerski RA; Department of Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Martin P; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Thompson AM; Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Eur Radiol ; 26(2): 322-30, 2016 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26065395
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Patient-tailored treatments for breast cancer are based on histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) texture analysis (TA) may be useful in non-invasive lesion subtype classification.

METHODS:

Women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer underwent pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. TA was performed using co-occurrence matrix (COM) features, by creating a model on retrospective training data, then prospectively applying to a test set. Analyses were blinded to breast pathology. Subtype classifications were performed using a cross-validated k-nearest-neighbour (k = 3) technique, with accuracy relative to pathology assessed and receiver operator curve (AUROC) calculated. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess raw entropy feature values.

RESULTS:

Histological subtype classifications were similar across training (n = 148 cancers) and test sets (n = 73 lesions) using all COM features (training 75%, AUROC = 0.816; test 72.5%, AUROC = 0.823). Entropy features were significantly different between lobular and ductal cancers (p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney U). IHC classifications using COM features were also similar for training and test data (training 57.2%, AUROC = 0.754; test 57.0%, AUROC = 0.750). Hormone receptor positive and negative cancers demonstrated significantly different entropy features. Entropy features alone were unable to create a robust classification model.

CONCLUSION:

Textural differences on contrast-enhanced MR images may reflect underlying lesion subtypes, which merits testing against treatment response. KEY POINTS • MR-derived entropy features, representing heterogeneity, provide important information on tissue composition. • Entropy features can differentiate between histological and immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancer. • Differing entropy features between breast cancer subtypes implies differences in lesion heterogeneity. • Texture analysis of breast cancer potentially provides added information for decision making.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom
...