Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The relationship between survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and process measures for emergency medical service ambulance team performance.
Chen, Tsung-Tai; Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming; Chen, Fen-Ju; Hu, Fu-Chang; Lu, Yu-Cheng; Chiang, Wen-Chu; Ko, Patrick Chow-In.
Affiliation
  • Chen TT; Department of Public Health, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Ma MH; Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen FJ; Department of Healthcare Administration, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Hu FC; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine and School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lu YC; Department of Healthcare Administration, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chiang WC; Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Ko PC; Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: patrick.patko@gmail.com.
Resuscitation ; 97: 55-60, 2015 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26083826
OBJECTIVE: International institutes have developed their own clinical performance indicators for ambulance services. It is unknown whether these process measures are related to survival of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to determine whether Emergency Medical Service (EMS)-related ambulance team process measures correlate with patient survival. METHODS: Four years of observational data were collected from an urban EMS OHCA registry. The two process measures were achieving an EMS response time ≤4 min and prehospital ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation). The outcome measure was survival to discharge. We used the GLMM (generalised linear mixed model) with stepwise selection to examine this process-outcome link at the patient and EMS team levels, respectively. RESULTS: We analyzed 3856 OHCA patients distributed across forty-three EMS ambulance teams. Survival to discharge was observed in 193 (5%) patients. The two EMS team process measures were positively associated with an improvement in survival at the patient level after case-mix adjustment. However, they were not associated with improvement in the risk-adjusted survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: The EMS team-level process measures proposed by international institutes may not predict the risk-adjusted survival rate. Using these measures to motivate EMS teams to improve their quality performance would be questionable. Increased efforts should be devoted to constructing more pivotal EMS team-level process measures that are tightly linked to survival.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ambulances / Process Assessment, Health Care / Hospital Rapid Response Team / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Resuscitation Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: Ireland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ambulances / Process Assessment, Health Care / Hospital Rapid Response Team / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Resuscitation Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: Ireland