Capturing step counts at slow walking speeds in older adults: comparison of ankle and waist placement of measuring device.
J Rehabil Med
; 47(9): 830-5, 2015 Oct 05.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26181670
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
It is important for older adults to be physically active, but many older adults walk slowly. This study examined the accuracy of a commercially available step-count device (Fitbit One) at slow speeds and compared the accuracy of the device when worn at the ankle and waist in older adults.METHODS:
The Fitbit One was placed at the ankle and waist of participants (n=42; mean age 73 years) while they performed walking trials at 7 different speeds (0.3-0.9 m/s). Step counts obtained from video recordings were used as the gold standard comparison to determine the accuracy of the device.RESULTS:
The ankle-worn device had significantly less error than the waist-worn device at all speeds. The percentage error of the ankle-worn device was less than 10% at speeds of 0.4-0.9 m/s and did not record zero steps at any speed. The percentage error of the waist-worn device was below 10% at only the 2 fastest speeds (0.8 and 0.9 m/s) and recorded zero steps for numerous participants at speeds of 0.3-0.5 m/s.CONCLUSION:
The Fitbit One can accurately capture steps at slow speeds when placed at the ankle and thus may be appropriate for capturing physical activity in slow-walking older adults.
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Walking
/
Monitoring, Ambulatory
/
Actigraphy
/
Ankle
Limits:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Language:
En
Journal:
J Rehabil Med
Journal subject:
REABILITACAO
Year:
2015
Document type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Canada