Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving guideline sensitivity and specificity for the identification of proactive gastrostomy placement in patients with head and neck cancer.
Brown, Teresa E; Crombie, Jane; Spurgin, Ann-Louise; Tripcony, Lee; Keller, Jacqui; Hughes, Brett G M; Dickie, Graeme; Kenny, Lizbeth Moira; Hodge, Robert A.
Affiliation
  • Brown TE; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Crombie J; Department of Speech Pathology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Spurgin AL; Department of Speech Pathology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Tripcony L; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Keller J; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Hughes BG; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Dickie G; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
  • Kenny LM; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Hodge RA; Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Head Neck ; 38 Suppl 1: E1163-71, 2016 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26268152
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Swallowing and nutrition guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer are available for identification of proactive gastrostomy placement in patients with high nutritional risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate improvements to the validity of these guidelines.

METHODS:

A multivariate analysis was fitted to the original dataset (n = 501) to examine the variables that may predict gastrostomy placement (eg, tumor site, treatment, sex, and age). Using these factors, the high risk category was modified and retrospectively validated in the same cohort to provide new measures of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS:

The following were positive predictors of gastrostomy placement T3 (p = .01), T4 (p < .001), and chemoradiotherapy (p < .001). Laryngeal (p = .02) and skin cancer (p < .001) were negative predictors. Modification of the high risk definition improved sensitivity to 58% and maintained specificity at 92%.

CONCLUSION:

Minor modifications to the high risk definition in the guidelines have improved the guideline sensitivity for future use. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38 E1163-E1171, 2016.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastrostomy / Head and Neck Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Head Neck Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastrostomy / Head and Neck Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Head Neck Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia