Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjuvant Therapy for Gallbladder Cancer: an Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
Hoehn, Richard S; Wima, Koffi; Ertel, Audrey E; Meier, Alexandra; Ahmad, Syed A; Shah, Shimul A; Abbott, Daniel E.
Affiliation
  • Hoehn RS; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Wima K; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Ertel AE; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Meier A; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Ahmad SA; Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0558, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
  • Shah SA; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Abbott DE; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. abbottdl@ucmail.uc.edu.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 19(10): 1794-801, 2015 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26293376
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected gallbladder cancer (GBC) is unclear.

METHODS:

The American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with resected GBC (pathologic stage 1-3) from 1998 to 2006 (n = 6690). We compared three groups surgery only (S, 78.6 %), surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC, 6.2 %), and surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (ACR, 15.1 %). Univariate and Cox regression analyses were used to determine factors influencing overall survival and the use of adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS:

ACR was associated with improved survival for all patients (HR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.66-0.90), especially node-positive patients (HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.53-0.78); AC was not associated with changes in survival. Patients were less likely to have their lymph nodes examined if they had any comorbidities, lower income, or were treated at community cancer centers (all p < 0.05). Among patients with unknown lymph node status, those with T2 or T3 disease saw improved survival with ACR (T2 HR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.63-0.99; T3 HR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.30-0.62), while AC did not affect survival.

CONCLUSION:

ACR is associated with improved survival for patients with node-positive GBC, as well as those with T2 or T3 GBC with unknown lymph node status.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cholecystectomy / Gallbladder Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cholecystectomy / Gallbladder Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States