Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intraarterial Microdosing: A Novel Drug Development Approach, Proof-of-Concept PET Study in Rats.
Burt, Tal; Rouse, Douglas C; Lee, Kihak; Wu, Huali; Layton, Anita T; Hawk, Thomas C; Weitzel, Douglas H; Chin, Bennett B; Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael; Chow, Shein-Chung; Noveck, Robert J.
Affiliation
  • Burt T; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and tal.burt@duke.edu.
  • Rouse DC; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Lee K; Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Knoxville, Tennessee.
  • Wu H; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Layton AT; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Hawk TC; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Weitzel DH; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Chin BB; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Cohen-Wolkowiez M; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Chow SC; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Noveck RJ; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
J Nucl Med ; 56(11): 1793-9, 2015 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26315828
UNLABELLED: Intraarterial microdosing (IAM) is a novel drug development approach combining intraarterial drug delivery and microdosing. We aimed to demonstrate that IAM leads to target exposure similar to that of systemic full-dose administration but with minimal systemic exposure. IAM could enable the safe, inexpensive, and early study of novel drugs at the first-in-human stage and the study of established drugs in vulnerable populations. METHODS: Insulin was administered intraarterially (ipsilateral femoral artery) or systemically to 8 CD IGS rats just before blood sampling or 60-min (18)F-FDG uptake PET imaging of ipsilateral and contralateral leg muscles (lateral gastrocnemius) and systemic muscles (spinotrapezius). The (18)F-FDG uptake slope analysis was used to compare the interventions. Plasma levels of insulin and glucose were compared using area under the curve calculated by the linear trapezoidal method. A physiologically based computational pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model was constructed to simulate the relationship between the administered dose and response over time. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG slope analysis found no difference between IAM and systemic full-dose slopes (0.0066 and 0.0061, respectively; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.024 to 0.029; P = 0.7895), but IAM slope was statistically significantly greater than systemic microdose (0.0018; 95% CI, -0.045 to -0.007; P = 0.0147) and sham intervention (-0.0015; 95% CI, 0.023-0.058; P = 0.0052). The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics data were used to identify model parameters that describe membrane insulin binding and glucose-insulin dynamics. CONCLUSION: Target exposure after IAM was similar to systemic full dose administration but with minimal systemic effects. The computational pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model can be generalized to predict whole-body response. Findings should be validated in larger, controlled studies in animals and humans using a range of targets and classes of drugs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiopharmaceuticals / Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 / Positron-Emission Tomography Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Nucl Med Year: 2015 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiopharmaceuticals / Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 / Positron-Emission Tomography Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Nucl Med Year: 2015 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States