Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of dual therapy with fenofibrate or fenofibric acid and a statin versus a double or equivalent dose of statin monotherapy.
Ouwens, Mario J N M; Nauta, Jos; Ansquer, Jean-Claude; Driessen, Stefan.
Affiliation
  • Ouwens MJ; a a Abbott Healthcare Products BV , Weesp , The Netherlands.
  • Nauta J; a a Abbott Healthcare Products BV , Weesp , The Netherlands.
  • Ansquer JC; b b Clinsciences , Dijon , France.
  • Driessen S; a a Abbott Healthcare Products BV , Weesp , The Netherlands.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 31(12): 2273-85, 2015 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26397380
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the efficacy of fenofibrate and statin dual therapy versus a double or equivalent dose of statin monotherapy.

METHODS:

A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was performed for publications before 1 January 2014 in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS Previews, among others.

RESULTS:

The difference in percentage change from baseline was in favor of dual therapy versus a double dose of statin monotherapy for triglycerides (difference -20%; standard error [SE] 2.6%) and HDL-C (8.7%; SE 1.2%), but not for LDL-C (8.4%; SE 1.5%), non-HDL-C (2.8%; SE 1.1%), total cholesterol (4.5%; SE 1.0%) and apolipoprotein B (2.6%; SE 1.1%). For high intensity statins, the difference in percentage change from baseline was in favor of dual therapy versus equivalent statin monotherapy for triglycerides (-17%; SE 2.6%) and for HDL-C (8.7%; SE 1.9%). The difference in percentage change from baseline for LDL-C was 6% (SE 1.7%), implying a greater reduction in LDL-C with statin monotherapy. For moderate intensity statins, the difference in percentage change from baseline was in favor of dual therapy versus equivalent statin monotherapy for triglycerides (-24.2%; SE 1.2%) and HDL-C (8.2%; SE 0.9%). LDL-C decreased 2.2% (SE 1.4%) more with dual therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY

FINDINGS:

When aiming to change HDL-C or triglycerides, dual therapy is to be preferred to doubling the statin dose; conversely, doubling the statin dose is to be preferred when aiming to reduce LDL-C. If the aim is both to change HDL-C or triglycerides and to reduce LDL-C, the importance of the three outcomes may need to be weighed depending on the intensity of the statin. Combining high intensity statin therapy with fenofibrate improves the effect on HDL-C and triglycerides, but lowers the effect on LDL-C. Combining a moderate intensity statin with fenofibrate improves the effect on HDL-C and triglycerides without reducing the effect on LDL-C. There is a need for long-term randomized clinical trials to compare dual therapy versus doubling the statin dose to assess the importance of improvement in HDL-C and triglycerides versus improvement in LDL-C in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. Further, the addition of ezetimibe to statin/fenofibrate therapy may be of interest.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fenofibrate / Cholesterol / Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Fenofibrate / Cholesterol / Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands