Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Propranolol in the treatment of infantile haemangiomas: lessons from the European Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce survey.
Wedgeworth, E; Glover, M; Irvine, A D; Neri, I; Baselga, E; Clayton, T H; Beattie, P E; Bjerre, J V; Burrows, N P; Foelster-Holst, R; Hedelund, L; Hernandez-Martin, A; Audrain, H; Bhate, K; Brown, S J; Baryschpolec, S; Darne, S; Durack, A; Dvorakova, V; Gach, J; Goldstraw, N; Goodyear, H; Grabczynska, S; Greenblatt, D; Halpern, J; Hearn, R M R; Hoey, S; Hughes, B; Jayaraj, R; Johansson, E K; Lam, M; Leech, S; O'Regan, G M; Morrison, D; Porter, W; Ramesh, R; Schill, T; Shaw, L; Taylor, A E M; Taylor, R; Thomson, J; Tiffin, P; Tsakok, M; Janmohamed, S R; Laguda, B; McPherson, T; Oranje, A P; Patrizi, A; Ravenscroft, J C; Shahidullah, H.
Affiliation
  • Wedgeworth E; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
  • Glover M; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
  • Irvine AD; National Children's Research Centre & Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Neri I; Dermatology Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
  • Baselga E; Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Department of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Clayton TH; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, U.K.
  • Beattie PE; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, U.K.
  • Bjerre JV; Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Burrows NP; Department of Dermatology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K.
  • Foelster-Holst R; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
  • Hedelund L; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Hernandez-Martin A; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
  • Audrain H; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, U.K.
  • Bhate K; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, U.K.
  • Brown SJ; Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, U.K.
  • Baryschpolec S; Department of Dermatology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, U.K.
  • Darne S; Department of Dermatology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, U.K.
  • Durack A; Department of Dermatology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K.
  • Dvorakova V; National Children's Research Centre & Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Gach J; Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, U.K.
  • Goldstraw N; Department of Dermatology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
  • Goodyear H; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K.
  • Grabczynska S; Department of Dermatology, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Amersham, U.K.
  • Greenblatt D; Department of Dermatology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
  • Halpern J; Department of Dermatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, U.K.
  • Hearn RM; Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, U.K.
  • Hoey S; Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, U.K.
  • Hughes B; Department of Dermatology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, U.K.
  • Jayaraj R; Department of Paediatrics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, U.K.
  • Johansson EK; Dermatological and Venereal Clinic, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lam M; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, U.K.
  • Leech S; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, U.K.
  • O'Regan GM; National Children's Research Centre & Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Morrison D; Department of Paediatric Ophthalmology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
  • Porter W; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, U.K.
  • Ramesh R; Department of Dermatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, U.K.
  • Schill T; Departments of Paediatrics & Paediatric Dermatology, Catholic Children's Hospital Wilhelmstift, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Shaw L; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, U.K.
  • Taylor AE; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, U.K.
  • Taylor R; Department of Ophthalmology, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, U.K.
  • Thomson J; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
  • Tiffin P; Department of Ophthalmology, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, U.K.
  • Tsakok M; Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, U.K.
  • Janmohamed SR; Department of Dermatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Laguda B; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
  • McPherson T; Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, U.K.
  • Oranje AP; Department of Dermatology (Paediatric Dermatology and Hair), Dermicis, Alkmaar and Foundation/Network for Pediatric Dermatology Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Patrizi A; Dermatology Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
  • Ravenscroft JC; Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, U.K.
  • Shahidullah H; Department of Dermatology, Derby NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, U.K.
Br J Dermatol ; 174(3): 594-601, 2016 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26473312
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Oral propranolol is widely prescribed as first-line treatment for infantile haemangiomas (IHs). Anecdotally, prescribing practice differs widely between centres.

OBJECTIVES:

The Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce was founded to establish patterns of use of propranolol in IHs.

METHODS:

Participating centres entered data on all of their patients who had completed treatment with oral propranolol for IHs, using an online data capture tool.

RESULTS:

The study cohort comprised 1097 children from 39 centres in eight European countries. 76·1% were female and 92·8% had a focal IH, with the remainder showing a segmental, multifocal or indeterminate pattern. The main indications for treatment were periocular location (29·3%), risk of cosmetic disfigurement (21·1%) and ulceration and bleeding (20·6%). In total 69·2% of patients were titrated up to a maintenance regimen, which consisted of 2 mg kg(-1) per day (85·8%) in the majority of cases. 91·4% of patients had an excellent or good response to treatment. Rebound growth occurred in 14·1% upon stopping, of whom 53·9% were restarted and treatment response was recaptured in 91·6% of cases. While there was no significant difference in the treatment response, comparing a daily maintenance dose of < 2 mg kg(-1) vs. 2 mg kg(-1) vs. > 2 mg kg(-1) , the risk of adverse events was significantly higher odds ratio (OR) 1 vs. adjusted OR 0·70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·33-1·50, P = 0·36 vs. OR 2·38, 95% CI 1·04-5·46, P = 0·04, Ptrend < 0·001.

CONCLUSIONS:

The PITCH survey summarizes the use of oral propranolol across 39 European centres, in a variety of IH phases, and could be used to inform treatment guidelines and the design of an interventional study.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Propranolol / Skin Neoplasms / Hemangioma / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Br J Dermatol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Propranolol / Skin Neoplasms / Hemangioma / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Br J Dermatol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom