Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors influencing the decision of older adults to be assessed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An exploratory study.
Lauck, Sandra B; Baumbusch, Jennifer; Achtem, Leslie; Forman, Jacqueline M; Carroll, Sandra L; Cheung, Anson; Ye, Jian; Wood, David A; Webb, John G.
Affiliation
  • Lauck SB; Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Canada sandra.lauck@phsa.ca.
  • Baumbusch J; University of British Columbia, Canada.
  • Achtem L; University of British Columbia, Canada.
  • Forman JM; Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Canada.
  • Carroll SL; Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Canada.
  • Cheung A; McMaster University, Canada.
  • Ye J; Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Canada.
  • Wood DA; University of British Columbia, Canada.
  • Webb JG; Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Canada.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 15(7): 486-494, 2016 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26498908
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the recommended therapy for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk and likely to derive benefit. Multimodality and multidisciplinary assessment is required for the heart team to determine eligibility for TAVI in a primarily older population. Little is known about patients' motivation and perspectives on making the decision to undergo the complex assessment.

AIMS:

To explore factors influencing patients' decision making to undergo TAVI eligibility assessment to inform practice, programme development, health policy and future research.

METHODS:

An exploratory qualitative approach was used. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 patients at the time of their referral for assessment to a quaternary cardiac and high volume TAVI centre.

RESULTS:

Multiple, intersecting factors that included biomedical, functional, social and environmental considerations influenced patients' decision. The six distinct factors were symptom burden, participants' perception as 'experienced' patients, expectations of benefit and risks, healthcare system and informal support, logistical barriers and facilitators, and obligations and responsibilities.

CONCLUSIONS:

The decision to undergo TAVI eligibility assessment is multifaceted and complex. Programmatic processes of care must be in place to facilitate appropriate and patient-centered decision making and access to TAVI. Strategies are required to mitigate the risks associated with the rapid deterioration of severe aortic stenosis, address patient and referring physicians' education needs, and provide individualised care and equitable access. Future research must focus on patients' experiences throughout the trajectory of TAVI care.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / ENFERMAGEM Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / ENFERMAGEM Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
...