Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Outbreak of Severe Group A Streptococcus Infections Associated with Podiatric Application of a Biologic Dermal Substitute.
Ibrahim, Lauren A; Sellick, John A; Watson, Elaine L; McCabe, Lisa M; Schoenhals, Karen A; Martinello, Richard A; Lesse, Alan J.
Affiliation
  • Ibrahim LA; 1Department of Medicine,University at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
  • Sellick JA; 1Department of Medicine,University at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
  • Watson EL; 2VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
  • McCabe LM; 2VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
  • Schoenhals KA; 2VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
  • Martinello RA; 3Office of Public Health,Veterans Health Administration,Washington, DC.
  • Lesse AJ; 1Department of Medicine,University at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(3): 306-12, 2016 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26673775
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe an outbreak of severe Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections that appeared to be associated with use of a biologic dermal substitute on foot wounds

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study of cases and similar uninfected patients SETTING/PATIENTS Patients attending the podiatry clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center between July 2011 and November 2011

INTERVENTIONS:

Microbiology laboratory data were reviewed for the calendar year, a case definition was established and use of the biologic dermal substitute was discontinued. Staff were cultured to identify potentially colonized employees. A case-cohort study was designed to investigate risk factors for disease. Emm typing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed to identify strain similarity.

RESULTS:

In 10 months, 14 cases were identified, and 4 of these patients died. All strains were emm type 28 and were identical according to PFGE. Discontinuation of biologic dermal substitute use halted the outbreak. A prior stroke was more common in the case cohort vs uninfected patient cohorts. The number of patients attending the clinic on 13 probable transmission days was significantly higher than on nontransmission days. We identified 2 patients who were present in the clinic on all but 1 probable transmission day. Surveillance cultures of podiatry clinic staff and cultures of the same lot of retained graft material were negative.

CONCLUSIONS:

A carrier was not identified, and we believe the outbreak was associated with inter-patient transmission likely due to lapses in infection control techniques. No additional cases have been identified in >3 years following the resumption of dermal substitute use in May 2012.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Streptococcal Infections / Cross Infection / Disease Outbreaks / Infection Control / Foot Ulcer / Skin, Artificial Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Streptococcal Infections / Cross Infection / Disease Outbreaks / Infection Control / Foot Ulcer / Skin, Artificial Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Year: 2016 Document type: Article
...