Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screening for Psychosocial Risk in Dutch Families of a Child With Cancer: Reliability, Validity, and Usability of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool.
Sint Nicolaas, Simone M; Schepers, Sasja A; Hoogerbrugge, Peter M; Caron, Huib N; Kaspers, Gertjan J L; van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M; Grootenhuis, Martha A; Verhaak, Chris M.
Affiliation
  • Sint Nicolaas SM; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Simone.SintNicolaas@radboudumc.nl.
  • Schepers SA; Emma Children's Hospital Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, the Bilt, the Netherlands.
  • Hoogerbrugge PM; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, the Bilt, the Netherlands.
  • Caron HN; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Kaspers GJ; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, the Bilt, the Netherlands, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and.
  • van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, the Bilt, the Netherlands, Sophia Children's Hospital Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Grootenhuis MA; Emma Children's Hospital Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, the Bilt, the Netherlands.
  • Verhaak CM; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J Pediatr Psychol ; 41(7): 810-9, 2016 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26715054
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed to screen for psychosocial risk in families of a child diagnosed with cancer. The current study is the first describing the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity, and usability of the PAT in an European country (Dutch translation).

METHODS:

A total of 117 families (response rate 59%) of newly diagnosed children with cancer completed the PAT2.0 and validation measures.

RESULTS:

Acceptable reliability was obtained for the PAT total score (α = .72) and majority of subscales (0.50-0.82). Two subscales showed inadequate internal consistency (Social Support α = .19; Family Beliefs α = .20). Validity and usability were adequate. Of the families, 66% scored low (Universal), 29% medium (Targeted), and 5% high (Clinical) risk.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study confirms the cross-cultural applicability, reliability, and validity of the PAT total score. Reliability left room for improvement on subscale level. Future research should indicate whether the PAT can be used to provide cost-effective care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parents / Psychological Tests / Mental Health / Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parents / Psychological Tests / Mental Health / Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Year: 2016 Document type: Article