Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A long way to go for the harmonization of four immunoassays for carcinoembryonic antigen.
Zhang, Kuo; Huo, Hong; Lin, Guigao; Yue, Yuhong; Wang, Qingtao; Li, Jinming.
Affiliation
  • Zhang K; National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, People's Republic of China.
  • Huo H; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Lin G; National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, People's Republic of China.
  • Yue Y; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang Q; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: wqt36@163.com.
  • Li J; National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: jmli@nccl.org.cn.
Clin Chim Acta ; 454: 15-9, 2016 Feb 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26721316
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the most widely used tumor markers worldwide. CEA immunoassays often yield different results. The objective of the present study was to investigate the current state of harmonization among CEA tests.

METHODS:

A total of 94 individual serum samples were divided into 3 subsets and measured in triplicate using 4 assays, Abbott Architect i2000SR, Beckman Access DXI800, Roche Cobas e601, and Siemens Advia Centaur XP. The standards from each manufacturer and the 1st International Reference Preparation (IRP) 73/601 of the World Health Organization were measured as unknowns in parallel with the patient samples using the 4 assays. The results of an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for CEA were also analyzed.

RESULTS:

A perfect correlation was not observed between any 2 assays, and the values obtained using the 4 assays were different for the detection of 94 individual patient serum samples. No consistency was detected in the CEA results evaluated by various assays for EQA samples, individual patient samples, the standards from each manufacturer, and the WHO IRP 73/601.

CONCLUSIONS:

Harmonization of the CEA results obtained using the 4 immunoassays has not yet been achieved.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoassay / Carcinoembryonic Antigen Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Chim Acta Year: 2016 Document type: Article Publication country: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Immunoassay / Carcinoembryonic Antigen Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Chim Acta Year: 2016 Document type: Article Publication country: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS