Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Palliative treatment of metastatic bone pain with radiopharmaceuticals: A perspective beyond Strontium-89 and Samarium-153.
Guerra Liberal, Francisco D C; Tavares, Adriana Alexandre S; Tavares, João Manuel R S.
Affiliation
  • Guerra Liberal FDC; Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: meb12020@fe.up.pt.
  • Tavares AAS; Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: adriana_tavares@msn.com.
  • Tavares JMRS; Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: tavares@fe.up.pt.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 110: 87-99, 2016 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26773820
PURPOSE: The present review article aims to provide an overview of the available radionuclides for palliative treatment of bone metastases beyond (89)Sr and (153)Sm. In addition, it aims to review and summarize the clinical outcomes associated with the palliative treatment of bone metastases using different radiopharmaceuticals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on Science Direct and PubMed databases (1990 - 2015). The following search terms were combined in order to obtain relevant results: "bone", "metastases", "palliative", "care", "therapy", "treatment", "radiotherapy", "review", "radiopharmaceutical", "phosphorus-32", "strontium-89", "yttrium-90", "tin-117m", "samarium-153", "holmium-166", "thulium-170", "lutetium-177", "rhenium-186", "rhenium-188" and "radium-223". Studies were included if they provided information regarding the clinical outcomes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A comparative analysis of the measured therapeutic response of different radiopharmaceuticals, based on previously published data, suggests that there is a lack of substantial differences in palliative efficacy among radiopharmaceuticals. However, when the comparative analysis adds factors such as patient's life expectancy, radionuclides' physical characteristics (e.g. tissue penetration range and half-life) and health economics to guide the rational selection of a radiopharmaceutical for palliative treatment of bone metastases, (177)Lu and (188)Re-labeled radiopharmaceuticals appear to be the most suitable radiopharmaceuticals for treatment of small and medium/large size bone lesions, respectively.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Bone Neoplasms / Radiopharmaceuticals Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Appl Radiat Isot Journal subject: MEDICINA NUCLEAR / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Bone Neoplasms / Radiopharmaceuticals Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Appl Radiat Isot Journal subject: MEDICINA NUCLEAR / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom