Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Obstacles to "race equality" in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena.
Salway, Sarah; Mir, Ghazala; Turner, Daniel; Ellison, George T H; Carter, Lynne; Gerrish, Kate.
Affiliation
  • Salway S; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: s.salway@sheffield.ac.uk.
  • Mir G; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.
  • Turner D; Quirkos, UK.
  • Ellison GT; Centre for Anthropological Research, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Carter L; NHS Yorkshire and Humber Commissioning Support, UK.
  • Gerrish K; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, UK.
Soc Sci Med ; 152: 102-10, 2016 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26851409
ABSTRACT
Inequitable healthcare access, experiences and outcomes across ethnic groups are of concern across many countries. Progress on this agenda appears limited in England given the apparently strong legal and policy framework. This disjuncture raises questions about how central government policy is translated into local services. Healthcare commissioning organisations are a potentially powerful influence on services, but have rarely been examined from an equity perspective. We undertook a mixed method exploration of English Primary Care Trust (PCT) commissioning in 2010-12, to identify barriers and enablers to commissioning that addresses ethnic healthcare inequities, employing- in-depth interviews with 19 national Key Informants; documentation of 10 good practice examples; detailed case studies of three PCTs (70+ interviews; extensive observational work and documentary analysis); three national stakeholder workshops. We found limited and patchy attention to ethnic diversity and inequity within English healthcare commissioning. Marginalization of this agenda, along with ambivalence, a lack of clarity and limited confidence, perpetuated a reinforcing inter-play between individual managers, their organisational setting and the wider policy context. Despite the apparent contrary indications, ethnic equity was a peripheral concern within national healthcare policy; poorly aligned with other more dominant agendas. Locally, consideration of ethnicity was often treated as a matter of legal compliance rather than integral to understanding and meeting healthcare needs. Many managers and teams did not consider tackling ethnic healthcare inequities to be part-and-parcel of their job, lacked confidence and skills to do so, and questioned the legitimacy of such work. Our findings indicate the need to enhance the skills, confidence and competence of individual managers and commissioning teams and to improve organizational structures and processes that support attention to ethnic inequity. Greater political will and clearer national direction is also required to produce the system change needed to embed action on ethnic inequity within healthcare commissioning.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: State Medicine / Racial Groups / Healthcare Disparities Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Soc Sci Med Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: State Medicine / Racial Groups / Healthcare Disparities Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Soc Sci Med Year: 2016 Document type: Article