Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying existing Choosing Wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology.
Hicks, Lisa K; Rajasekhar, Anita; Bering, Harriet; Carson, Kenneth R; Kleinerman, Judith; Kukreti, Vishal; Ma, Alice; Mueller, Brigitta U; O'Brien, Sarah H; Panepinto, Julie A; Pasquini, Marcelo C; Sarode, Ravi; Wood, William A.
Affiliation
  • Hicks LK; St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rajasekhar A; University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Bering H; Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Beverly, Massachusetts.
  • Carson KR; Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Kleinerman J; Medical Specialists of Taunton, Taunton, Massachusetts.
  • Kukreti V; University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.
  • Ma A; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Mueller BU; All Children's Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, St. Petersburg, Florida.
  • O'Brien SH; Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Panepinto JA; Medical College of Wisconsin/Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Pasquini MC; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Sarode R; UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Wood WA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Am J Hematol ; 91(8): 787-92, 2016 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27152483
ABSTRACT
Choosing Wisely (CW) is a medical stewardship initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with professional medical societies in the United States. In an effort to learn from and leverage the work of others, the American Society of Hematology CW Task Force developed a method to identify and prioritize CW recommendations from other medical societies of high relevance and importance to patients with blood disorders and their physicians. All 380 CW recommendations were reviewed and assessed for relevance and importance. Relevance was assessed using the MORE(TM) relevance scale. Importance was assessed with regard to six guiding principles harm avoidance, evidence, aggregate cost, relevance, frequency and impact. Harm avoidance was considered the most important principle. Ten highly relevant and important recommendations were identified from a variety of professional societies. Recommendations focused on decreasing unnecessary imaging, blood work, treatments and transfusions, as well as on increasing collaboration across disciplines and considering value when recommending treatments. Many CW recommendations have relevance beyond the society of origin. The methods developed by the ASH CW Task Force could be easily adapted by other Societies to identify additional CW recommendations of relevance and importance to their fields. Am. J. Hematol. 91787-792, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Practice Guidelines as Topic / Hematology Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Hematol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Practice Guidelines as Topic / Hematology Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Hematol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada