Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hodgkin Lymphoma-Unfavorable Clinical Stage I and II.
Roberts, Kenneth B; Younes, Anas; Hodgson, David C; Advani, Ranjana; Dabaja, Bouthaina S; Dhakal, Sughosh; Flowers, Christopher R; Ha, Chul S; Hoppe, Bradford S; Mendenhall, Nancy P; Metzger, Monika L; Plastaras, John P; Shapiro, Ronald; Smith, Sonali M; Terezakis, Stephanie A; Winkfield, Karen M; Constine, Louis S.
Affiliation
  • Roberts KB; *Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT †Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, American Society of Clinical Oncology ¶University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY ‡Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada §Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA, American Society of Clinical Oncology ∥University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston **University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX #Emory University, Atlanta, GA, American Societ
Am J Clin Oncol ; 39(4): 384-95, 2016 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27299425
These guidelines review the historical evolution of treatment for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with current standards that rely on prognostic factors to risk stratify and direct current treatment schemes that includes differentiation of favorable and unfavorable presentations. The major clinical trials for unfavorable early-stage HL are reviewed. Patients in this heterogenous subgroup of classic HL are best managed with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The role of imaging response assessment as a means to modify therapy is a strategy under investigation. Tailoring the radiation treatment volume and radiation dose prescription along with selective use of modern conformal techniques is expected to help reduce long-term toxicities. Many patients are well served receiving involved-site radiotherapy to 30 Gy after appropriate systemic therapy intensity; but, there are nuances for which some variations in the chemotherapy and radiotherapy specifics are appropriately individualized. Following a discussion of the current evidence-based treatment algorithms, several different example cases are reviewed to help physicians make appropriate treatment decisions. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hodgkin Disease / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hodgkin Disease / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States