Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Application of Cytogenetic Test for Diagnosis of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma].
Tang, Yin; Wang, Wei; Gao, Li; Sun, Yue; Gao, Ya-Yue; Zhang, Chun-Xia; Gong, Ming; Huang, Fan-Zhou; Li, Zhen-Ling; Ma, Yi-Gai.
Affiliation
  • Tang Y; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Wang W; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Gao L; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Sun Y; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Gao YY; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Zhang CX; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Gong M; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Huang FZ; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Li ZL; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Ma YG; Department of Hematology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China. E-mail: dr_myg@163.com.
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi ; 24(3): 727-32, 2016 Jun.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342499
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of cytogenetic analysis in the detection of bone marrow (BM) involvement in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: The bone marrow samples of 74 patients with NHL were detection by using morphology, cytogenetic test, flow cytometry and molecular biological assay. The detected results of morphology, cytogenetic test, flow cytometry and molecular biological assay alone and thier combined detection were compared, the detective rate and consistencies of the 4 methods were analyzed. RESULTS: The detection rates of BM involvement by using morphology, cytogenetic, flow cytometry, and molecular biological assays were 21.6%, 17.6%, 23.0% and 33.8% respectively. The detective rate was enhanced to 44.6% by combining the 4 methods. Cytogenetic test showed the result consistent with the other methods. CONCLUSION: Although cytogenetic test shows a lower detective rate than the other methods, but in some patients the cytogenetic test can detect the abnormality of bone marrow which can not be detected by other methods alone, the combination test of 4 detection methods can enhance the detectable rate of BM involvement.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Marrow / Bone Marrow Examination / Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / Cytogenetic Analysis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: Zh Journal: Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Marrow / Bone Marrow Examination / Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / Cytogenetic Analysis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: Zh Journal: Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: China