Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival of patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spinal tumours and the impact of surgical site infection.
Atkinson, R A; Davies, B; Jones, A; van Popta, D; Ousey, K; Stephenson, J.
Affiliation
  • Atkinson RA; Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK; Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: ross.atkinson@mancheste
  • Davies B; Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
  • Jones A; Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
  • van Popta D; Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
  • Ousey K; School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
  • Stephenson J; School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
J Hosp Infect ; 94(1): 80-5, 2016 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27444231
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with metastatic spinal tumours have a limited prognosis. Surgical complications that may result in prolonged hospitalization or readmission are highly undesirable. Surgical site infection (SSI) is one such complication, which can, in extreme cases, lead to death.

AIM:

To assess the impact of SSI on patient survival after surgery for spinal metastases.

METHODS:

Demographic, operative, and survival data were collected on 152 patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis at a large UK tertiary referral centre. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and the Revised Tokuhashi Score (RTS) were determined as measures of health status and prognosis, respectively, at baseline. A semi-parametric Cox proportional hazards survival analysis was used to assess the relationships between covariates and survival.

FINDINGS:

Seventeen patients (11.2%) experienced SSI. Overall, median survival time from operation was 262 days (95% confidence interval 190-334 days) and 12-month survival was 42.1%. RTS (hazard ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.89; P < 0.001) and ASA grade (1.37; 1.03-1.82; P=0.028) were significantly associated with survival, with better survival found in patients with higher RTS and lower ASA scores. Infection status was of substantive importance, with better survival in those without SSI (P=0.075).

CONCLUSION:

Twelve-month survival in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis is ∼42%. RTS and ASA scores may be used as indicators of patient survival either in combination or individually. Whereas SSI has some negative impact on survival, a larger study sample would be needed to confirm whether this is statistically significant.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Neoplasms / Surgical Wound Infection Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Neoplasms / Surgical Wound Infection Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2016 Document type: Article