Improved CT Detection of Acute Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Encephalitis Based on a Frequency-Selective Nonlinear Blending: Comparison With MRI.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of a new CT postprocessing tool based on frequency-selective nonlinear blending (best-contrast CT) with that of standard linear blending of unenhanced head CT in patients with herpes simplex virus type 1 and herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSE), using FLAIR MRI sequences as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients (six women and nine men; mean [± SD] age, 60 ± 19 years) with proven HSE (positive polymerase chain reaction results from CSF analysis and the presence of neurologic deficits) were retrospectively enrolled. All patients had undergone head CT and MRI (mean time interval, 2 ± 2 days). After standardized unenhanced head CT scans were read, presets of the best-contrast algorithm were determined (center, 30 HU; delta, 5 HU; slope, 5 nondimensional), and resulting images were analyzed. Contrast enhancement was objectively measured by ROI analysis, comparing contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of unenhanced CT and best-contrast CT. FLAIR and DWI MRI sequences were analyzed, and FLAIR was considered as the standard of reference. For assessment of disease extent, a previously reported 50-point score (HSE score) was used. RESULTS: CNR values for unenhanced head CT (CNR, 5.42 ± 2.77) could be statistically significantly increased using best-contrast CT (CNR, 9.62 ± 4.28) (p = 0.003). FLAIR sequences yielded a median HSE score of 9.0 (range, 6-17) and DWI sequences yielded HSE scores of 6.0 (range, 5-17). By comparison, unenhanced head CT resulted in a median HSE score of 3.5 (range, 1-6). The median best-contrast CT HSE score was 7.5 (range, 6-10). Agreement between FLAIR and unenhanced CT was 54.44%, that between DWI and best-contrast CT was 95.36%, and that between FLAIR and best-contrast CT was 85.21%. The most frequently overseen findings were located at the level of the upper part of the mesencephalon and at the subthalamic or insular level. CONCLUSION: Frequency-selective nonlinear blending significantly increases contrast and detects brain parenchymal involvement in HSE more sensitively compared with unenhanced CT. The sensitivity of best-contrast CT seems to be equal to that of DWI and almost as good as that of FLAIR.