Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological Evaluation of Patients Seeking Rhinoplasty.
Kucur, Cuneyt; Kuduban, Ozan; Ozturk, Ahmet; Gozeler, Mustafa Sitki; Ozbay, Isa; Deveci, Erdem; Simsek, Eda; Kaya, Zulkuf.
Affiliation
  • Kucur C; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dumlupinar University Evliya Çelebi Training and Research Hospital, Kütahya, Turkey.
  • Kuduban O; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Erzurum Bölge Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Ozturk A; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bezmialem University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Gozeler MS; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Atatürk University Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Ozbay I; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dumlupinar University Evliya Çelebi Training and Research Hospital, Kütahya, Turkey.
  • Deveci E; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bezmialem University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Simsek E; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Erzurum Bölge Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Kaya Z; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Erzurum Bölge Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Eurasian J Med ; 48(2): 102-6, 2016 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27551172
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate different determinants of the patient's psychosocial functioning that might possibly affect the outcome of rhinoplastic surgery. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Forty-one patients undergoing rhinoplasty, consecutively admitted to and operated upon at the Department of Otolaryngology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, were studied with regard to their psychological characteristics.

RESULTS:

In the patient group, Liebowitz anxiety, Liebowitz/avoidance, and Liebowitz/total scores were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). No significant differences were found between the patient and control groups according to Rosenberg self-esteem scale and The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. In the Quality of Life SF-36 results, significant differences were found between the patient and control groups apart from SF-36 scores of pain (p<0.05), vitality (p<0.05), social functioning (p<0.05) and emotional role difficulties (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Patient selection must be done very carefully to obviate not only physical, but also psychological postoperative complications. The SF-36 questionnaire may be of value in screening-patients for psychological problems prior to rhinoplasty.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Eurasian J Med Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Eurasian J Med Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey