Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Total ankle replacement versus arthrodesis (TARVA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Goldberg, Andrew J; Zaidi, Razi; Thomson, Claire; Doré, Caroline J; Skene, Simon S; Cro, Suzie; Round, Jeff; Molloy, Andrew; Davies, Mark; Karski, Michael; Kim, Louise; Cooke, Paul.
Affiliation
  • Goldberg AJ; UCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science (IOMS), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH), London, UK.
  • Zaidi R; UCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science (IOMS), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH), London, UK.
  • Thomson C; Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
  • Doré CJ; Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
  • Skene SS; Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
  • Cro S; MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
  • Round J; School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Molloy A; Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Davies M; Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
  • Karski M; Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK.
  • Kim L; Joint Research and Enterprise Office, St George's University of London and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Cooke P; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open ; 6(9): e012716, 2016 09 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27601503
INTRODUCTION: Total ankle replacement (TAR) or ankle arthrodesis (fusion) is the main surgical treatments for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA). The popularity of ankle replacement is increasing while ankle fusion rates remain static. Both treatments have efficacy but to date all studies comparing the 2 have been observational without randomisation, and there are no published guidelines as to the most appropriate management. The TAR versus arthrodesis (TARVA) trial aims to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of TAR against ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of end-stage ankle OA in patients aged 50-85 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TARVA is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that will randomise 328 patients aged 50-85 years with end-stage ankle arthritis. The 2 arms of the study will be TAR or ankle arthrodesis with 164 patients in each group. Up to 16 UK centres will participate. Patients will have clinical assessments and complete questionnaires before their operation and at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after surgery. The primary clinical outcome of the study is a validated patient-reported outcome measure, the Manchester Oxford foot questionnaire, captured preoperatively and 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include quality-of-life scores, complications, revision, reoperation and a health economic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee (London, Bloomsbury 14/LO/0807). This manuscript is based on V.5.0 of the protocol. The trial findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02128555.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteoarthritis / Postoperative Complications / Arthrodesis / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspects: Ethics / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteoarthritis / Postoperative Complications / Arthrodesis / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspects: Ethics / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom